1 00:00:05,630 --> 00:00:02,990 I think it has been fairly conclusively 2 00:00:07,730 --> 00:00:05,640 demonstrated that this pyramid UFO is 3 00:00:10,490 --> 00:00:07,740 actually just out of focus with the 4 00:00:12,470 --> 00:00:10,500 triangle shape being bulky it's probably 5 00:00:13,970 --> 00:00:12,480 just a plane because it moves on flashes 6 00:00:15,770 --> 00:00:13,980 like a plane 7 00:00:17,870 --> 00:00:15,780 you can see a summary of all that in my 8 00:00:19,730 --> 00:00:17,880 last video but a few interesting 9 00:00:22,070 --> 00:00:19,740 questions remain for the sky identify 10 00:00:23,450 --> 00:00:22,080 nerds out there like these two triangles 11 00:00:25,849 --> 00:00:23,460 what are they 12 00:00:29,810 --> 00:00:25,859 are actually stars in the constellation 13 00:00:31,609 --> 00:00:29,820 Akila called ocab and okaborealis I'll 14 00:00:32,810 --> 00:00:31,619 explain how I figured this out and how 15 00:00:34,610 --> 00:00:32,820 we can use it to get some rough 16 00:00:37,250 --> 00:00:34,620 estimates of the speed of the plane like 17 00:00:41,630 --> 00:00:39,350 when you are looking to identify stars 18 00:00:44,209 --> 00:00:41,640 is really helpful to know the dates time 19 00:00:46,010 --> 00:00:44,219 and location of the photo or video 20 00:00:48,410 --> 00:00:46,020 we don't really have specifics about 21 00:00:51,410 --> 00:00:48,420 this video but it seems to be related to 22 00:00:55,369 --> 00:00:51,420 the events described in the USS Russell 23 00:00:57,590 --> 00:00:55,379 logbook July 14 2019 sometime after nine 24 00:00:59,930 --> 00:00:57,600 in the evening we also have a location a 25 00:01:01,250 --> 00:00:59,940 latitude and a longitude at the very 26 00:01:04,910 --> 00:01:01,260 start of the video we see a 27 00:01:06,230 --> 00:01:04,920 constellation of stars at Dylan DTV on 28 00:01:08,210 --> 00:01:06,240 Twitter discovered that this was 29 00:01:10,429 --> 00:01:08,220 actually Jupiter and teres and some 30 00:01:12,590 --> 00:01:10,439 other stars we can use the free software 31 00:01:14,570 --> 00:01:12,600 stellarium into the location and the 32 00:01:16,490 --> 00:01:14,580 time and then look towards Jupiter a 33 00:01:19,370 --> 00:01:16,500 planet not a star and it is a perfect 34 00:01:21,410 --> 00:01:19,380 fit for around 10 past 9 Pacific time in 35 00:01:22,910 --> 00:01:21,420 that location 36 00:01:24,950 --> 00:01:22,920 watching the full video there's another 37 00:01:26,990 --> 00:01:24,960 style that makes a brief appearance 38 00:01:28,910 --> 00:01:27,000 and then we see these two 39 00:01:30,289 --> 00:01:28,920 they're pretty much vertical and the 40 00:01:32,510 --> 00:01:30,299 lower one is a bit brighter but 41 00:01:33,710 --> 00:01:32,520 otherwise not super distinctive so hard 42 00:01:35,450 --> 00:01:33,720 to find 43 00:01:37,310 --> 00:01:35,460 I realized though that the camera did 44 00:01:38,810 --> 00:01:37,320 not move very far and we could roughly 45 00:01:41,030 --> 00:01:38,820 track the motion by looking at the 46 00:01:42,889 --> 00:01:41,040 clouds after boosting the contrast 47 00:01:45,350 --> 00:01:42,899 so I tracked from the initial position 48 00:01:48,170 --> 00:01:45,360 looking towards Jupiter past the single 49 00:01:51,050 --> 00:01:48,180 star which is probably Russell Hague and 50 00:01:53,270 --> 00:01:51,060 then on to the two final Stars bingo 51 00:01:56,450 --> 00:01:53,280 pretty much at that exact spot there are 52 00:01:59,450 --> 00:01:56,460 the two stars ocab and ocab Borealis 53 00:02:01,490 --> 00:01:59,460 also called Epsilon achille 54 00:02:02,870 --> 00:02:01,500 this shows that the plane is moving in a 55 00:02:05,270 --> 00:02:02,880 straight line and that it flies just 56 00:02:06,350 --> 00:02:05,280 under ocap without context this kind of 57 00:02:08,089 --> 00:02:06,360 looks like there's another triangle 58 00:02:10,910 --> 00:02:08,099 flying around but it's just the lowest 59 00:02:12,350 --> 00:02:10,920 star of the two ocab 60 00:02:14,150 --> 00:02:12,360 and now we've got a good handle on where 61 00:02:15,470 --> 00:02:14,160 in the sky the plane is and what the 62 00:02:17,210 --> 00:02:15,480 stars are we can have a Basher 63 00:02:19,610 --> 00:02:17,220 estimating its speed 64 00:02:21,830 --> 00:02:19,620 if we take these two stars Antares and 65 00:02:23,750 --> 00:02:21,840 larawag we can enter in their Celestial 66 00:02:26,449 --> 00:02:23,760 coordinates to this calculator and we 67 00:02:28,670 --> 00:02:26,459 can see they're about 7.8 degrees apart 68 00:02:30,110 --> 00:02:28,680 we can then scale that up to the 69 00:02:33,229 --> 00:02:30,120 diameter of the night vision camera and 70 00:02:35,150 --> 00:02:33,239 we find the field of view is 17.2 71 00:02:37,070 --> 00:02:35,160 degrees 72 00:02:39,710 --> 00:02:37,080 at this point in the video the plane is 73 00:02:41,990 --> 00:02:39,720 in the middle and ocab is nearly at the 74 00:02:43,970 --> 00:02:42,000 edge we know that the plane passes ocav 75 00:02:45,710 --> 00:02:43,980 so the time it takes to get there is the 76 00:02:47,509 --> 00:02:45,720 time it will take to Traverse just under 77 00:02:50,270 --> 00:02:47,519 half the field of view about eight 78 00:02:52,790 --> 00:02:50,280 degrees we time that in these 10 seconds 79 00:02:55,130 --> 00:02:52,800 so the angular speed of the plane at 80 00:02:57,290 --> 00:02:55,140 this point is about 0.8 degrees per 81 00:03:00,110 --> 00:02:57,300 second looking at the traffic in the 82 00:03:00,890 --> 00:03:00,120 area a typical altitude is around 33 000 83 00:03:04,670 --> 00:03:00,900 feet 84 00:03:06,589 --> 00:03:04,680 ocab is at around 42 degrees so let's 85 00:03:08,630 --> 00:03:06,599 round that up to 45 degrees as we don't 86 00:03:10,729 --> 00:03:08,640 know the exact time so the plane will be 87 00:03:11,690 --> 00:03:10,739 about as far away horizontally as it is 88 00:03:13,430 --> 00:03:11,700 high 89 00:03:17,869 --> 00:03:13,440 we can then use Pythagoras to get a line 90 00:03:20,270 --> 00:03:17,879 of slight distance of around 45 000 feet 91 00:03:23,089 --> 00:03:20,280 assuming it's flying perpendicular to us 92 00:03:24,830 --> 00:03:23,099 then we can take the 0.8 degrees per 93 00:03:27,110 --> 00:03:24,840 second and see how far along the 94 00:03:29,750 --> 00:03:27,120 circumference of a circle of radius 45 95 00:03:31,729 --> 00:03:29,760 000 feet will gives you 0.8 degrees 96 00:03:34,070 --> 00:03:31,739 that will show how far the plane moves 97 00:03:34,910 --> 00:03:34,080 in one second I.E the speed in feet per 98 00:03:36,710 --> 00:03:34,920 second 99 00:03:39,289 --> 00:03:36,720 we can work this out and do the unit 100 00:03:41,630 --> 00:03:39,299 conversion to not with Google 45 000 101 00:03:44,649 --> 00:03:41,640 times 2 times pi divided by 360 times 102 00:03:47,930 --> 00:03:44,659 0.8 feet per second in knots which gives 103 00:03:50,030 --> 00:03:47,940 372 knots the ground speed 104 00:03:51,949 --> 00:03:50,040 so that's consistent with the plane uh 105 00:03:53,990 --> 00:03:51,959 but given the ocab is in our bearing of 106 00:03:55,309 --> 00:03:54,000 a 100 degrees and the planes in the 107 00:03:58,190 --> 00:03:55,319 region are generally on a heading of 108 00:03:59,690 --> 00:03:58,200 around 40. then the plane is probably 109 00:04:01,670 --> 00:03:59,700 not flying perpendicular to the camera 110 00:04:04,250 --> 00:04:01,680 so the actual speed will be a bit higher 111 00:04:06,949 --> 00:04:04,260 like 400 plus knots which is the same as 112 00:04:09,170 --> 00:04:06,959 the traffic overhead 113 00:04:12,050 --> 00:04:09,180 what if it were just 700 feet up around 114 00:04:14,210 --> 00:04:12,060 1 000 feet away that's about eight knots 115 00:04:16,610 --> 00:04:14,220 around nine mile per hour so it could be 116 00:04:18,890 --> 00:04:16,620 a nearby drone moving slowly but I think 117 00:04:20,689 --> 00:04:18,900 a plane is a better fit as we know there 118 00:04:23,450 --> 00:04:20,699 were planes there and the angular speed